1. Heijl A. The times they are a-changin': time to change glaucoma management. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(1):92–99. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02328.x2. Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T, et al. Progressive Macula Vessel Density Loss in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Longitudinal Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:107–117. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5610624/pdf/nihms894292.pdf3. Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA. Detecting Structural Progression in Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12S):S57–S65. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6882427/pdf/nihms-914221.pdf4. Zhang X, Dastiridou A, Francis BA, et al. Comparison of Glaucoma Progression Detection by Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Field. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;184:63–74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894829/pdf/nihms915148.pdf 5. Öhnell H, Heijl A, Anderson H, Bengtsson B. Detection of glaucoma progression by perimetry and optic disc photography at different stages of the disease: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):281–287. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412870/pdf/AOS-95-281.pdf 6. Rao HL, Begum VU, Khadka D, Mandal AK, Senthil S, Garudadri CS. Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127233. Published 2015 May 15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433281/ 7. Wu Z, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Zangwill LM. Comparing 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Fields for Detecting Progressive Central Visual Loss in Glaucoma Eyes with Early Central Abnormalities. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(2):95–102. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6860370/ 8. Lee JM, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K, et al. Baseline prognostic factors predict rapid visual field deterioration in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2228–2236. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2189730